I had a test on Thursday, on Synchronisation -- which is the technical stuff that occurs to get audio and video (analogue and digital) devices locked together in various kinds of audio/visual production facilities.
At RMIT these competencies are covered in a subject called
Audio For Media. My tutor for this subject is Tim Johnston, who also teaches the EMT (Electronic Music Technology) subject.
Tim was a house engineer at Metropolis, which until recently (when it closed doors for good) was the Mecca for big music production values in Melbourne. Tim has a pretty neat CV from what I could find online when I was researching which course to do in 2008. This is his very short career blurb from the 2006 Ausmusic/Metropolis/3PBS Masterclass series website.
TIM JOHNSTON (Producer/Engineer)
Credits:
Nick Cave & the Badseeds, The Waifs, Stereophonics, Dallas Crane, Even, Tex Perkins…
From
here.
Not bad, huh?
I mention this because technically I already completed the competency in Synchronisation at THAT PLACE, where I actually had to stripe analogue tape with timecode, and lock it to both Protools and two Umatic video playback/recorders. The "gentleman" who took that class has no notable production credentials in industry outside those sponsored and facilitated by the TAFE. Whatever that means - something that ain't nothing.
The way the Diploma in Music Production is structured, all the competencies have to be covered, but the training providers can package them into subjects any way they want. It was easier to just slot into the RMIT course structure, than try to pull apart individual parts that I have/have not covered.
Also, at RMIT I'm getting far superior written support materials, and a lot more experience in Protools and Logic, which are of more application than analogue chops. Not sorry I've played with vintage equipment (although it certainly wasn't worth the headfuck of THAT PLACE.)
So, test in Synchronisation - Tim graded the tests and emailed the results out THE SAME DAY we took the test. He didn't give us any student names - just student numbers, which is kinda cool as I can see how I fared in terms of entire class performance. I've further cut the doc to protect the anonymity of those students who didn't go so great.
I didn't get 100% - but then no one did. Four students got 18 (92%), and I'm one of them. Getting the highest grade given is OK by me.
I actually wrote "trick question?" next to one answer, and a "?" next to another -- so I reckon those are the ones I got wrong. One of them was a small boring math thing (unlike a lot of the interesting math things), and the other was nowhere near my study notes. Anyway, so far I am still in A or A+ territory with all my results, which is not a bad place to be.